Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2024
Automated prediction of isthmus areas in scar-related atrial tachycardias using artificial intelligence.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Saluja Deepak, Huang Ziyi, Majumder Jonah, Zeldin Lawrence, Yarmohammadi Hirad, Biviano Angelo, Wan Elaine Y, Ciaccio Edward J, Hendon Christine P, Garan Hasan
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Ablation of scar-related reentrant atrial tachycardia (SRRAT) involves identification and ablation of a critical isthmus. A graph convolutional network (GCN) is a machine learning structure that is well-suited to analyze the irregularly-structured data obtained in mapping procedures and may be used to identify potential isthmuses.
METHODS: Electroanatomic maps from 29 SRRATs were collected, and custom electrogram features assessing key tissue and wavefront properties were calculated for each point. Isthmuses were labeled off-line. Training data was used to determine the optimal GCN parameters and train the final model. Putative isthmus points were predicted in the training and test populations and grouped into proposed isthmus areas based on density and distance thresholds. The primary outcome was the distance between the centroids of the true and closest proposed isthmus areas.
RESULTS: A total of 193 821 points were collected. Thirty isthmuses were detected in 29 tachycardias among 25 patients (median age 65.0, 5 women). The median (IQR) distance between true and the closest proposed isthmus area centroids was 8.2 (3.5, 14.4) mm in the training and 7.3 (2.8, 16.1) mm in the test group. The mean overlap in areas, measured by the Dice coefficient, was 11.5 ± 3.2% in the training group and 13.9 ± 4.6% in the test group.
CONCLUSION: A GCN can be trained to identify isthmus areas in SRRATs and may help identify critical ablation targets.
METHODS: Electroanatomic maps from 29 SRRATs were collected, and custom electrogram features assessing key tissue and wavefront properties were calculated for each point. Isthmuses were labeled off-line. Training data was used to determine the optimal GCN parameters and train the final model. Putative isthmus points were predicted in the training and test populations and grouped into proposed isthmus areas based on density and distance thresholds. The primary outcome was the distance between the centroids of the true and closest proposed isthmus areas.
RESULTS: A total of 193 821 points were collected. Thirty isthmuses were detected in 29 tachycardias among 25 patients (median age 65.0, 5 women). The median (IQR) distance between true and the closest proposed isthmus area centroids was 8.2 (3.5, 14.4) mm in the training and 7.3 (2.8, 16.1) mm in the test group. The mean overlap in areas, measured by the Dice coefficient, was 11.5 ± 3.2% in the training group and 13.9 ± 4.6% in the test group.
CONCLUSION: A GCN can be trained to identify isthmus areas in SRRATs and may help identify critical ablation targets.