Respiratory medicine · 2016
Exhaled nitric oxide as a diagnostic tool for wheezing in preschool children: A diagnostic accuracy study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sayão Larissa Bouwman, de Britto Murilo Carlos Amorim, Burity Edjane, Rattes Catarina, Reinaux Cyda Maria Albuquerque, Fink James, Dornelas de Andrade Armèle
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Airways inflammation may precede pulmonary dysfunction in wheezing individuals. The fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) has been described as a useful method for wheezing diagnosis in children, however, its application requires evidence. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of FENO in identifying wheezing in preschoolers.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out with children from 3 to 5 years old, from Brazilian day care centers and public schools. They were evaluated by FENO measurement through the single breath method, and by ATS-DLD-78-C questionnaire that is used as a gold standard to phenotype wheezing patterns.
RESULTS: The sample consisted of 243 non-wheezing children, 118 non-recurrent wheezing and 62 recurrent wheezing. The means of FENO and confidence intervals of 95%, were 5.4 (CI 95%, 5.2-5.6); 7.5 (CI 95%, 6.9-8.2) and 11.2 (CI 95%, 9.6-12.7), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive FENO values in the 6 parts per billion (ppb) cut-off point that best diagnosed wheezing of non-wheezing children, were: 65.5%, 84.3%, 75.6% and 76.7%, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.77. At 10 ppb, the best cut-off points for differentiating recurrent wheezing of non-recurrent wheezing were: 56.4%, 81.3%, 61.4%, 78.0%, respectively, with an AUC = 0.69. The post-test probability for each FENO cut-off points was increased by 33% for wheezing and 20% for recurrent wheezing diagnosis when associated with clinical examination.
CONCLUSION: FENO can provide a reliable and accurate method to discriminate the presence and type of wheezing in preschoolers with 92% of acceptable in this study population.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out with children from 3 to 5 years old, from Brazilian day care centers and public schools. They were evaluated by FENO measurement through the single breath method, and by ATS-DLD-78-C questionnaire that is used as a gold standard to phenotype wheezing patterns.
RESULTS: The sample consisted of 243 non-wheezing children, 118 non-recurrent wheezing and 62 recurrent wheezing. The means of FENO and confidence intervals of 95%, were 5.4 (CI 95%, 5.2-5.6); 7.5 (CI 95%, 6.9-8.2) and 11.2 (CI 95%, 9.6-12.7), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive FENO values in the 6 parts per billion (ppb) cut-off point that best diagnosed wheezing of non-wheezing children, were: 65.5%, 84.3%, 75.6% and 76.7%, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.77. At 10 ppb, the best cut-off points for differentiating recurrent wheezing of non-recurrent wheezing were: 56.4%, 81.3%, 61.4%, 78.0%, respectively, with an AUC = 0.69. The post-test probability for each FENO cut-off points was increased by 33% for wheezing and 20% for recurrent wheezing diagnosis when associated with clinical examination.
CONCLUSION: FENO can provide a reliable and accurate method to discriminate the presence and type of wheezing in preschoolers with 92% of acceptable in this study population.