[Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer-data from 17,149 patients from 125 certified centers].
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kowalski Christoph, Sibert Nora Tabea, Hammerer Peter, Wesselmann Simone, Feick Günter, Carl Ernst-Günther, Klotz Theodor, Apel Hendrik, Dieng Sebastian, Nyarangi-Dix Joanne, Knoll Thomas, Reike Moritz Johannes, Duwe Gregor, Bartolf Elisabeth, Steiner Thomas, Borowitz Rainer, Lümmen Gerd, Seitz Anna Katharina, Pfitzenmaier Jesco, Aziz Atiqullah, Brock Marko, Berger Frank Peter, Kaftan Björn Theodor, Grube Christian, Häfner Tim, Hamza Amir, Schmelz Hans, Haas Jürgen, Lenart Sebastian, Lafita Anselm, Sippel Carsten, Winter Alexander, Kedia George, Hadaschik Boris, Varga Zoltan, Buse Stephan, Richter Matthias, Distler Florian, Simon Jörg, Wiegel Thomas, Baltes Stefan, Janitzky Andreas, Sommer Jens Peter, Hijazi Sameh, Fülkell Philipp, Harke Nina N, Bolenz Christian, Khalil Christian, Breidenbach Clara, Tennstedt Pierre, Burchardt Martin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to present data on the frequency and severity of urinary incontinence after RPE from routine care.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Information from the PCO (Prostate Cancer Outcomes) study is used, which was collected between 2016 and 2022 in 125 German Cancer Society (DKG)-certified prostate cancer centers in 17,149 patients using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26). Changes in the "incontinence" score before (T0) and 12 months after RPE (T1) and the proportion of patients who used pads, stratified by age and risk group, are reported.
RESULTS: The average score for urinary incontinence (value range: 0-worst possible to 100-best possible) was 93 points at T0 and 73 points 12 months later. At T0, 97% of the patients did not use a pad, compared to 56% at T1. 43% of the patients who did not use a pad before surgery used at least one pad a day 12 months later, while 13% use two or more. The proportion of patients using pads differs by age and risk classification.
CONCLUSION: The results provide a comprehensive insight into functional outcome 12 months after RPE and can be taken into account when informing patients.