Heart rhythm · 2024
Efficacy of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients without an ICD implantation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Le, Ding Ligang, Wu Lingmin, Zheng Lihui, Zhou Likun, Zhang Zhenhao, Xiong Yulong, Zhang Zhuxin, Yao Yan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) prevents sudden cardiac death in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Catheter ablation has been shown to effectively reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence, yet its efficacy in patients without an ICD implantation remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the outcomes of ablation for VT in patients with ICM without a backup ICD.
METHODS: Patients with ICM who received ablation for VT without an ICD implantation were included in this study. Ablation was guided by either activation mapping or substrate mapping. Endocardial ablation was the primary strategy; epicardial access was considered when endocardial ablation failed. The primary end point was VT recurrence during follow-up; secondary end points included cardiovascular rehospitalization, all-cause mortality, and a composite of these events.
RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were included, with the mean age of 58.2 ± 11.1 years, 102 of whom (89.5%) were male. Twelve patients (10.5%) underwent endo-epicardial ablation, whereas the rest received endocardial ablation. With a median follow-up of 53.8 months (24.8-84.2 months), VT recurred in 45 patients (39.5%), and 6 patients (5.3%) died, including 2 sudden cardiac deaths. The recurrence rate of VT was significantly lower in patients undergoing endo-epicardial ablation than in those with endocardial ablation only (8.3% vs 43.1%; log-rank P = .032). After multivariate adjustment, epicardial ablation remained associated with a reduced risk of VT recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% confidential interval, 0.02-0.98; P = .048).
CONCLUSION: Patients with ICM undergoing VT ablation without a backup ICD experienced a notably low rate of arrhythmic death. Most recurrences proved nonlethal.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the outcomes of ablation for VT in patients with ICM without a backup ICD.
METHODS: Patients with ICM who received ablation for VT without an ICD implantation were included in this study. Ablation was guided by either activation mapping or substrate mapping. Endocardial ablation was the primary strategy; epicardial access was considered when endocardial ablation failed. The primary end point was VT recurrence during follow-up; secondary end points included cardiovascular rehospitalization, all-cause mortality, and a composite of these events.
RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were included, with the mean age of 58.2 ± 11.1 years, 102 of whom (89.5%) were male. Twelve patients (10.5%) underwent endo-epicardial ablation, whereas the rest received endocardial ablation. With a median follow-up of 53.8 months (24.8-84.2 months), VT recurred in 45 patients (39.5%), and 6 patients (5.3%) died, including 2 sudden cardiac deaths. The recurrence rate of VT was significantly lower in patients undergoing endo-epicardial ablation than in those with endocardial ablation only (8.3% vs 43.1%; log-rank P = .032). After multivariate adjustment, epicardial ablation remained associated with a reduced risk of VT recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% confidential interval, 0.02-0.98; P = .048).
CONCLUSION: Patients with ICM undergoing VT ablation without a backup ICD experienced a notably low rate of arrhythmic death. Most recurrences proved nonlethal.