Clinical breast cancer · 2026
SENOPAUSE: Evaluation of an ASCO-Derived Clinical Proxy for Axillary Risk Stratification in a Retrospective Cohort.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cazenave Michel Gabriel, Mahiou Katia, Elahi Leslie, Maumy Louise, Pauly Léa, Guillot Eugénie, Miailhe Grégoire, Pouget Nicolas, Benoit Louise, Trotin Mathis, Bonneau Claire
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) omission is increasingly considered in carefully selected postmenopausal patients with low-risk, early-stage breast cancer. However, the prevalence of occult nodal disease and wether nodal information alters adjuvant management remain key concerns in real-world implementation.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, two-center observational study using an institutional REDCap database. Consecutive patients treated surgically between 2023 and 2024 were screened and a strict proxy of ASCO eligibility criteria for SLNB omission was applied (postmenopausal; HR-positive/HER2-negative; invasive ductal carcinoma; T0 to T1; grade 1 to 2; no neoadjuvant therapy). The primary outcome was the prevalence of pN1 disease within the ASCO-eligible cohort. Secondary outcomes included adjuvant chemotherapy use, whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT), and availability of genomic testing.
RESULTS: Among 662 screened patients, 211 met all ASCO proxy eligibility criteria. Occult nodal involvement was observed in 20/211 patients (9.5%, pN1). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 10/211 patients (4.7%), while WBRT was delivered in 203/211 (95.7%). Genomic testing was available in 17/211 patients (8.1%) and was predominantly low-risk among those tested (13/17, 76%). Within the pN1 subgroup (n = 20), chemotherapy was administered in 4/20 patients (20%), and genomic testing was available in 8/20 (40%).
CONCLUSION: In a real-world cohort meeting strict ASCO proxy criteria, approximately 1 in ten patients had occult pN1 disease, yet chemotherapy use remained uncommon and WBRT was near-universal. These findings suggest nodal status may have limited impact on downstream adjuvant treatment escalation in highly selected low-risk luminal breast cancers.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, two-center observational study using an institutional REDCap database. Consecutive patients treated surgically between 2023 and 2024 were screened and a strict proxy of ASCO eligibility criteria for SLNB omission was applied (postmenopausal; HR-positive/HER2-negative; invasive ductal carcinoma; T0 to T1; grade 1 to 2; no neoadjuvant therapy). The primary outcome was the prevalence of pN1 disease within the ASCO-eligible cohort. Secondary outcomes included adjuvant chemotherapy use, whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT), and availability of genomic testing.
RESULTS: Among 662 screened patients, 211 met all ASCO proxy eligibility criteria. Occult nodal involvement was observed in 20/211 patients (9.5%, pN1). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 10/211 patients (4.7%), while WBRT was delivered in 203/211 (95.7%). Genomic testing was available in 17/211 patients (8.1%) and was predominantly low-risk among those tested (13/17, 76%). Within the pN1 subgroup (n = 20), chemotherapy was administered in 4/20 patients (20%), and genomic testing was available in 8/20 (40%).
CONCLUSION: In a real-world cohort meeting strict ASCO proxy criteria, approximately 1 in ten patients had occult pN1 disease, yet chemotherapy use remained uncommon and WBRT was near-universal. These findings suggest nodal status may have limited impact on downstream adjuvant treatment escalation in highly selected low-risk luminal breast cancers.