MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5414/cncs109509

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical nephrology. Case studies · 2018

A case of nephrotic syndrome showing contemporary presence of apolipoprotein E2 homozygote glomerulopathy and membranous nephropathy-like findings modified by apolipoprotein E Toyonaka.

Hirashima Hisako, Komiya Toshiyuki, Toriu Naoya, Hara Shigeo, Matsunaga Akira, Saito Takao, Muso Eri

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 79-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for proteinuria due to nephrotic syndrome. Renal biopsy revealed focal sclerosis and foam cell infiltration in the glomerulus. In addition, electron microscopic findings (EM) revealed peculiar electron-dense deposits (EDDs) in both sides of the glomerular basement membrane. Although subepithelial deposits had spike formation highly resembling those seen in membranous nephropathy (MN), immunoglobulins and complements were not identified by immunofluorescence study, and microbubbles appeared in high magnification of EM different from the immune disease. The analysis of apolipoprotein (Apo) E showed an elevated concentration of plasma ApoE. The phenotype, genotype, and DNA sequence studies revealed homozygous ApoE2/2 and a novel missense mutation called ApoE Toyonaka (Ser197Cys). This case may confirm the independent responsibility of ApoE2/2 and ApoE Toyonaka for ApoE2 homozygote glomerulopathy and MN-like EDD findings, respectively.

Для цитирования: Hirashima Hisako, Komiya Toshiyuki, Toriu Naoya, Hara Shigeo, Matsunaga Akira, Saito Takao, Muso Eri. A case of nephrotic syndrome showing contemporary presence of apolipoprotein E2 homozygote glomerulopathy and membranous nephropathy-like findings modified by apolipoprotein E Toyonaka.. Clinical nephrology. Case studies. 2018. DOI: 10.5414/cncs109509.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.