MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.11.007

Медицинская библиотека · Brain and language · 2014

Lexical and sublexical orthographic processing: an ERP study with skilled and dyslexic adult readers.

Araújo Susana, Faísca Luís, Bramão Inês, Reis Alexandra, Petersson Karl Magnus

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This ERP study investigated the cognitive nature of the P1-N1 components during orthographic processing. We used an implicit reading task with various types of stimuli involving different amounts of sublexical or lexical orthographic processing (words, pseudohomophones, pseudowords, nonwords, and symbols), and tested average and dyslexic readers. An orthographic regularity effect (pseudowords-nonwords contrast) was observed in the average but not in the dyslexic group. This suggests an early sensitivity to the dependencies among letters in word-forms that reflect orthographic structure, while the dyslexic brain apparently fails to be appropriately sensitive to these complex features. Moreover, in the adults the N1-response may already reflect lexical access: (i) the N1 was sensitive to the familiar vs. less familiar orthographic sequence contrast; (ii) and early effects of the phonological form (words-pseudohomophones contrast) were also found. Finally, the later N320 component was attenuated in the dyslexics, suggesting suboptimal processing in later stages of phonological analysis.

Для цитирования: Araújo Susana, Faísca Luís, Bramão Inês, Reis Alexandra, Petersson Karl Magnus. Lexical and sublexical orthographic processing: an ERP study with skilled and dyslexic adult readers.. Brain and language. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.11.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.