MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1053/jinf.2001.0867

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of infection · 2001

Seroprevalence to polio in personnel at a virology institute.

Schoub B D, Blackburn N K, McAnerney J M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To determine the level of immunity to polio in adult personnel at the National Institute for Virology (NIV), South Africa.

METHODS

Polio neutralizing antibodies results on 776 NIV staff members tested between 1979 and 1999 and seroresponses in seronegative personnel given a booster vaccination were analysed.

RESULTS

613 of the 776 (79%) personnel had neutralizing polio antibodies to all three types, independent of age, gender, race or job category. Types 1 and 2 antibodies were found in 92% and 94%, respectively, but type 3 was less prevalent at 87%. Of the 93 persons seronegative to one or more types, 13 failed to respond to the first booster vaccination and 8 remained as non-responders after two booster vaccinations. Of the 19 personnel who were bled four days after booster vaccination, 16 (84%) had already developed an antibody response.

CONCLUSIONS

Most (79%) adult laboratory personnel retained detectable levels of neutralizing antibodies to polio, independent of age, gender, race or job category, and even in those persons lacking detectable antibodies, most (84%) responded with a secondary immune response. Nevertheless the immunity gap, particularly to type 3, mandates routine screening of personnel potentially exposed to wild-type polio virus and a booster vaccination for seronegatives.

Для цитирования: Schoub B D, Blackburn N K, McAnerney J M. Seroprevalence to polio in personnel at a virology institute.. The Journal of infection. 2001. DOI: 10.1053/jinf.2001.0867.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.