Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2021
Administration of parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia: a population level observational study using routinely collected data held in the National Neonatal Research Database.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gale Chris, Jeyakumaran Dusha, Longford Nicholas, Battersby Cheryl, Ojha Shalini, Oughham Kayleigh, Dorling Jon
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Parenteral nutrition is commonly administered during therapeutic hypothermia. Randomised trials in critically ill children indicate that parenteral nutrition may be harmful.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia and clinically important outcomes.
DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based cohort study using the National Neonatal Research Database; propensity scores were used to create matched groups for comparison.
SETTING: National Health Service neonatal units in England, Scotland and Wales.
PARTICIPANTS: 6030 term and near-term babies, born 1/1/2010 and 31/12/2017, who received therapeutic hypothermia; 2480 babies in the matched analysis.
EXPOSURE: We compared babies that received any parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia with babies that did not.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: blood culture confirmed late-onset infection; secondary outcomes: treatment for late onset infection, necrotising enterocolitis, survival, length of stay, measures of breast feeding, hypoglycaemia, central line days, time to full enteral feeds, discharge weight.
RESULTS: 1475/6030 babies (25%) received parenteral nutrition. In comparative matched analyses, the rate of culture positive late onset infection was higher in babies that received parenteral nutrition (0.3% vs 0.9%; difference 0.6; 95% CI 0.1, 1.2; p=0.03), but treatment for presumed infection was not (difference 0.8%, 95% CI -2.1 to 3.6, p=0.61). Survival was higher in babies that received parenteral nutrition (93.1% vs 90.0%; rate difference 3.1, 95% CI 1.5, 4.7; p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia is associated with higher late-onset infection but lower mortality. This finding may be explained by residual confounding. Research should address the risks and benefits of parenteral nutrition in this population.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia and clinically important outcomes.
DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based cohort study using the National Neonatal Research Database; propensity scores were used to create matched groups for comparison.
SETTING: National Health Service neonatal units in England, Scotland and Wales.
PARTICIPANTS: 6030 term and near-term babies, born 1/1/2010 and 31/12/2017, who received therapeutic hypothermia; 2480 babies in the matched analysis.
EXPOSURE: We compared babies that received any parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia with babies that did not.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: blood culture confirmed late-onset infection; secondary outcomes: treatment for late onset infection, necrotising enterocolitis, survival, length of stay, measures of breast feeding, hypoglycaemia, central line days, time to full enteral feeds, discharge weight.
RESULTS: 1475/6030 babies (25%) received parenteral nutrition. In comparative matched analyses, the rate of culture positive late onset infection was higher in babies that received parenteral nutrition (0.3% vs 0.9%; difference 0.6; 95% CI 0.1, 1.2; p=0.03), but treatment for presumed infection was not (difference 0.8%, 95% CI -2.1 to 3.6, p=0.61). Survival was higher in babies that received parenteral nutrition (93.1% vs 90.0%; rate difference 3.1, 95% CI 1.5, 4.7; p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia is associated with higher late-onset infection but lower mortality. This finding may be explained by residual confounding. Research should address the risks and benefits of parenteral nutrition in this population.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Combined Modality TherapyEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFemaleGestational AgeHumansHypothermia, InducedInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLength of StayMaleOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareParenteral NutritionRetrospective StudiesRoutinely Collected Health DataSepsisSurvival AnalysisUnited Kingdom