MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/09273948.2011.592260

Медицинская библиотека · Ocular immunology and inflammation · 2011

Survey of expert practice and perceptions of the supporting clinical evidence for the management of uveitis-related cataract and cystoid macular oedema.

Sreekantam Sreekanth, Denniston Alastair K O, Murray Philip I

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To survey the practice of uveitis experts in the management of uveitic cataract and cystoid macular oedema (CMO).

METHODS

A structured questionnaire containing two clinical scenarios was sent to members of the International Uveitis Study Group (IUSG). The questionnaire surveyed both respondents' current practice and their perception of the supporting clinical evidence.

RESULTS

For uveitic cataract, 70% required a 3-month inflammation-free period before surgery, and 76% gave a prophylactic preoperative systemic corticosteroid. For uveitic CMO, 87% gave corticosteroids, usually orally. Preferred second-line agents were methotrexate (39%), cyclosporin (24%), azathioprine (17%), and mycophenolate (7%). Respondents suggested the evidence underlying their decisions was either absent or relatively weak (levels III or IV), and in most cases personal experience was a factor.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey highlights areas of consensus and variation among uveitis experts in managing uveitic cataract and CMO, and emphasizes the need for further clinical trials to establish the best practice.

Для цитирования: Sreekantam Sreekanth, Denniston Alastair K O, Murray Philip I. Survey of expert practice and perceptions of the supporting clinical evidence for the management of uveitis-related cataract and cystoid macular oedema.. Ocular immunology and inflammation. 2011. DOI: 10.3109/09273948.2011.592260.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.