Wei sheng yan jiu = Journal of hygiene research · 2014
[Evaluation on the capability of testing carbon tetrachloride, benzene, methylbenzene, dimethylbenzene, p' p-DDT of the provincial centers for disease control and prevention].
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Jiaolan, Cao Ningtao, Li Shiyao, Chen Dongqing
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) provincial divisions' capabilities of detectingconcentrations of organic parameters such as carbon tetrachloride, benzene, methylbenzene, dimethylbenzene and pesticide parameter of p’ p-DDT in drinking water, by adopting a quality control assessment methodology of interlaboratory comparison.
METHODS: All laboratories had been divided into 2 groups, each of which contained aboutl6 laboratories. Organic concentrations and pesticide concentrations were assigned to 2 sample groups. Testing capabilities of the laboratories were evaluated through the use of robust statistical methods.
RESULTS: Thirty CDC provincial divisions, including municipalities under the central government and in autonomous regions, participated in this interlaboratory comparison. Twenty laboratories obtained positive results in all parameters, accounting for 66.7%. Eight laboratories' results were suspicious, accounting for 26.7%. Finally, 2 laboratories produced outliers, accounting for 6.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of provincial CDC participants in this interlaboratory comparison are capable of testing the concentrations of organic parameterssuch as carbon tetrachloride, benzene, and methylbenzene, dimethyl benzene, and pesticide concentrations of p' p-DDT in drinking water.
METHODS: All laboratories had been divided into 2 groups, each of which contained aboutl6 laboratories. Organic concentrations and pesticide concentrations were assigned to 2 sample groups. Testing capabilities of the laboratories were evaluated through the use of robust statistical methods.
RESULTS: Thirty CDC provincial divisions, including municipalities under the central government and in autonomous regions, participated in this interlaboratory comparison. Twenty laboratories obtained positive results in all parameters, accounting for 66.7%. Eight laboratories' results were suspicious, accounting for 26.7%. Finally, 2 laboratories produced outliers, accounting for 6.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of provincial CDC participants in this interlaboratory comparison are capable of testing the concentrations of organic parameterssuch as carbon tetrachloride, benzene, and methylbenzene, dimethyl benzene, and pesticide concentrations of p' p-DDT in drinking water.