MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-6-554

Медицинская библиотека · BMC research notes · 2013

Management of an extended clivus fracture: a case report.

Evers Julia J E, Vieth Volker V V, Hartensuer René R H, Raschke Michael M J R, Vordemvenne Thomas T V

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Clivus fractures are highly uncommon. The classification by Corradino et al. divides the different lesions in longitudinal, transverse and oblique fractures. Longitudinal types are associated with the highest mortality rate between 67 - 80%. Clivus fractures are often found after high velocity trauma, especially traffic accidents and falls. The risk of neurologic lesions is high, because of the anatomic proximity to neurovascular structures like the brainstem, the vertebrobasilar artery, and the cranial nerves. Longitudinal clivus fractures have a special risk of causing entrapment of the basilar artery and thus ischemia of the brainstem.

CASE PRESENTATION: This lesion in our patient was a combination-fracture of the craniocervical junction with a transverse clivus fracture. In this case, the primary closed reduction of the clivus fracture and the immobilization with a halo device was the therapy of choice and led to consolidation of the fracture.

CONCLUSION

Therapy advices and examples in the literature are scarce. We present a patient with a clivus fracture, who could be well treated by a halo device. Through detailed research of the literature a therapy algorithm has been developed.

Для цитирования: Evers Julia J E, Vieth Volker V V, Hartensuer René R H, Raschke Michael M J R, Vordemvenne Thomas T V. Management of an extended clivus fracture: a case report.. BMC research notes. 2013. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-554.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.