ERJ open research · 2024
A comparison of respiratory oscillometry and spirometry in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: performance time, symptom burden and test-retest reliability.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Patel Suhani, Sylvester Karl P, Wu Zhe, Rhamie Serena, Dickel Peter, Maher Toby M, Molyneaux Philip L, Calverley Peter M A, Man William D-C
Аннотация
STUDY QUESTION: In large multinational patient surveys, spirometry (which requires repeated, reproducible maximal efforts) can be associated with cough, breathlessness and tiredness, particularly in those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Oscillometry is an effort-independent test of airways resistance and reactance. We hypothesised that oscillometry would take less time to perform and would be associated with reduced symptom burden than spirometry.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Spirometry and oscillometry were performed in 66 participants with IPF and repeated 2 weeks later. We compared time taken to perform tests, symptom burden and test-retest reliability with Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
RESULTS: Oscillometry took significantly less time to perform than spirometry (mean -4.5 (99% CI -6.0 to -3.0) min) and was associated with lower symptom burden scores for cough (-1.3, 99% CI -1.7 to -0.8), breathlessness (-1.0, 99% CI -1.4 to -0.5), and tiredness (-0.5, 99% CI -0.9 to -0.2). On Bland-Altman analysis, all measures showed good agreement, with narrow limits of agreement and the mean bias lying close to 0 in all cases. The ICCs for forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity were 0.94 and 0.89, respectively, and ranged between 0.70 and 0.90 for oscillometry measures.
CONCLUSION: Oscillometry is quicker to perform and provokes less symptoms than spirometry in patients with IPF.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Spirometry and oscillometry were performed in 66 participants with IPF and repeated 2 weeks later. We compared time taken to perform tests, symptom burden and test-retest reliability with Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
RESULTS: Oscillometry took significantly less time to perform than spirometry (mean -4.5 (99% CI -6.0 to -3.0) min) and was associated with lower symptom burden scores for cough (-1.3, 99% CI -1.7 to -0.8), breathlessness (-1.0, 99% CI -1.4 to -0.5), and tiredness (-0.5, 99% CI -0.9 to -0.2). On Bland-Altman analysis, all measures showed good agreement, with narrow limits of agreement and the mean bias lying close to 0 in all cases. The ICCs for forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity were 0.94 and 0.89, respectively, and ranged between 0.70 and 0.90 for oscillometry measures.
CONCLUSION: Oscillometry is quicker to perform and provokes less symptoms than spirometry in patients with IPF.