MedElevator
Войти в исследования Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
[Influence of therapeutic temperature management on the clinical course in patients after in-hospital cardiac arrest : A retrospective analysis].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wanek Felix, Meißner Stefanie, Nuding Sebastian, Hoberück Sebastian, Werdan Karl, Noutsias Michel, Ebelt Henning
Аннотация
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in the ICU of the cardiologic department of the University Hospital of Halle (Saale) between 1999 and 2009.
RESULTS: During the observation period, 169 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest and information regarding temperature measurements were treated. Invasive therapeutic temperature management (TTM+) was applied in 64 patients (37.9%), while 105 patients (62.1%) underwent no therapeutic temperature management (TTM-). TTM+ and TTM- showed no relevant differences regarding patient age (TTM+: 67.6 ± 12.6 years; TTM-: 69.8 ± 12.6 years; p = 0.257), comorbidities and the initial rhythm; however, there were more men in the TTM+ group (76.6% vs. 58.1%; p = 0.015). All patients had been intubated. Time until ROSC in TTM+ was significantly longer (25.9 ± 25.8 min vs. 15.0 ± 12.4 min; p < 0.005). TTM+ resulted in a lower 30-day survival and an unfavourable neurologic outcome (Glasgow outcome scale I or II: 75% TTM+ vs. 55.2% TTM-). This negative effect persisted after adjustment for age of the patients, but not after adjustment for age and duration of reanimation (nonadjusted odds ratio for adverse neurologic outcome under TTM+: 0.411 (p = 0.011); odds ratio after adjusting for age: 0.361 (p = 0.09); odds ratio after adjusting for age and duration of the reanimation: 0.505 (p = 0.121)).
RESULTS: During the observation period, 169 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest and information regarding temperature measurements were treated. Invasive therapeutic temperature management (TTM+) was applied in 64 patients (37.9%), while 105 patients (62.1%) underwent no therapeutic temperature management (TTM-). TTM+ and TTM- showed no relevant differences regarding patient age (TTM+: 67.6 ± 12.6 years; TTM-: 69.8 ± 12.6 years; p = 0.257), comorbidities and the initial rhythm; however, there were more men in the TTM+ group (76.6% vs. 58.1%; p = 0.015). All patients had been intubated. Time until ROSC in TTM+ was significantly longer (25.9 ± 25.8 min vs. 15.0 ± 12.4 min; p < 0.005). TTM+ resulted in a lower 30-day survival and an unfavourable neurologic outcome (Glasgow outcome scale I or II: 75% TTM+ vs. 55.2% TTM-). This negative effect persisted after adjustment for age of the patients, but not after adjustment for age and duration of reanimation (nonadjusted odds ratio for adverse neurologic outcome under TTM+: 0.411 (p = 0.011); odds ratio after adjusting for age: 0.361 (p = 0.09); odds ratio after adjusting for age and duration of the reanimation: 0.505 (p = 0.121)).