MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fped.2022.927708

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022

Validation of the Gait Disorientation Test in children with concussion.

Alkathiry Abdulaziz A, Alsubaie Saud F, Alsalaheen Bara A, Whitney Susan L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) or concussion is a complex injury that is difficult to diagnose and assess. There are negative impacts on cognition, balance, and mobility after a concussion. The Gait Disorientation Test (GDT) is an objective measure that assesses a person's balance ability by comparing the walking time with eyes open and the walking time with eyes closed in a standardized walking task. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and the diagnostic properties of the GDT in children with concussions.

METHODS

Thirty-six children with concussions, and 91 controls aged between 9 and 18 years old participated in the study. Participants completed demographics, the GDT, the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), the Pediatric Vestibular Symptom Questionnaire (PVSQ), and the Pediatric Visually Induced Dizziness Questionnaire (PVID).

RESULTS

Children with concussions showed higher (worse) GDT scores (M = 2.18 ± 1.93 s) than healthy controls (M = 1.13 ± 0.95 s), which was statistically significant (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

The GDT was able to distinguish between children with concussions and healthy controls. Given the simplicity of the GDT, it can be used to assist in discriminating between children with and without concussion.

Для цитирования: Alkathiry Abdulaziz A, Alsubaie Saud F, Alsalaheen Bara A, Whitney Susan L. Validation of the Gait Disorientation Test in children with concussion.. Frontiers in pediatrics. 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.927708.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.