Lancet (London, England) · 1984
Adverse outcome of pregnancy and the quality of obstetric care.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Niswander K, Henson G, Elbourne D, Chalmers I, Redman C, Macfarlane A, Tizard P
Аннотация
The case-control method was used to study the relation between four possibly preventable adverse outcomes of pregnancy and suboptimal antepartum and intrapartum obstetric care defined by clinical consensus. Fetuses whose deaths were ascribed to asphyxia or trauma, and babies born at term who had seizures within 48 h of delivery, were significantly more likely than controls to have received suboptimal care during pregnancy. Babies with seizures, as well as those with terminal apnoea, were also substantially more likely than controls to have been born after a failure to react appropriately to signs of severe fetal distress during labour. Most of the babies who received suboptimal obstetric care, however, did not have any of these adverse outcomes. In addition, most babies with these adverse outcomes had apparently received satisfactory obstetric care. No relation was detected between cerebral palsy and suboptimal obstetric care.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentApneaAsphyxia NeonatorumBirth InjuriesCerebral PalsyClinical Trials as TopicEnglandEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleFetal DistressFetal MonitoringHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesLabor, ObstetricPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareProspective StudiesQuality of Health CareRiskSeizures