MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/1752-1947-6-257

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical case reports · 2012

Traumatic asphyxia due to blunt chest trauma: a case report and literature review.

Sertaridou Eleni, Papaioannou Vasilios, Kouliatsis Georgios, Theodorou Vasiliki, Pneumatikos Ioannis

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Crush asphyxia is different from positional asphyxia, as respiratory compromise in the latter is caused by splinting of the chest and/or diaphragm, thus preventing normal chest expansion. There are only a few cases or small case series of crush asphyxia in the literature, reporting usually poor outcomes.

CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 44-year-old Caucasian man who developed traumatic asphyxia with severe thoracic injury and mild brain edema after being crushed under heavy auto vehicle mechanical parts. He remained unconscious for an unknown time. The treatment included oropharyngeal intubation and mechanical ventilation, bilateral chest tube thoracostomies, treatment of brain edema and other supportive measures. Our patient's outcome was good. Traumatic asphyxia is generally under-reported and most authors apply supportive measures, while the final outcome seems to be dependent on the length of time of the chest compression and on the associated injuries.

CONCLUSION

Treatment for traumatic asphyxia is mainly supportive with special attention to the re-establishment of adequate oxygenation and perfusion; treatment of the concomitant injuries might also affect the final outcome.

Для цитирования: Sertaridou Eleni, Papaioannou Vasilios, Kouliatsis Georgios, Theodorou Vasiliki, Pneumatikos Ioannis. Traumatic asphyxia due to blunt chest trauma: a case report and literature review.. Journal of medical case reports. 2012. DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-6-257.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.