DOI 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102761
Abnormal effective connectivity in the sensory network in writer's cramp.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Writer's cramp (WC), a task specific form of dystonia, is considered to be a motor network disorder, but abnormal sensory tactile processing has also been acknowledged. The sensory spatial discrimination threshold (SDT) can be determined with a spatial acuity test (JVP domes). In addition to increased SDT, patients with WC exhibited dysfunctional sensory processing in the sensory cortex, insula, basal ganglia and cerebellum in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study while performing the spatial acuity test.
OBJECTIVES
To assess whether effective connectivity (EC) in the sensory network including cortical, basal ganglia, thalamic and cerebellar regions of interest in WC patients is abnormal.
METHODS
We used fMRI and applied a block design, while 19 WC patients and 13 age-matched healthy controls performed a spatial discrimination task. Before we assessed EC using dynamic causal modelling, we compared three model structures based on the current literature. We enclosed regions of interest that are established for sensory processing during right hand stimulation: Left thalamus, somatosensory, parietal and insular cortex, posterior putamen, and right cerebellum.
RESULTS
The EC analysis revealed task-dependent decreased unidirectional connectivity between the insula and the posterior putamen. The connectivity involving the primary sensory cortex, parietal cortex and cerebellum were not abnormal in WC. The two groups showed no differences in their behavioural data.
CONCLUSIONS
Perception and integration of sensory information requires the exchange of information between the insula cortex and the putamen, a sensory process that was disturbed in WC patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.