MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1055665617744065

Медицинская библиотека · The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2018

Predicting Adverse Perioperative Events in Patients Undergoing Primary Cleft Palate Repair.

Basta Marten N, Fiadjoe John E, Woo Albert S, Peeples Kenneth N, Jackson Oksana A

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify risk factors for adverse perioperative events (APEs) after cleft palatoplasty to develop an individualized risk assessment tool.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Tertiary institutional.

PATIENTS: Patients younger than 2 years with cleft palate.

INTERVENTIONS: Primary Furlow palatoplasty between 2008 and 2011.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Adverse perioperative event, defined as laryngo- or bronchospasm, accidental extubation, reintubation, obstruction, hypoxia, or unplanned intensive care unit admission.

RESULTS

Three hundred patients averaging 12.3 months old were included. Cleft distribution included submucous, 1%; Veau 1, 17.3%; Veau 2, 38.3%; Veau 3, 30.3%; and Veau 4, 13.0%. Pierre Robin (n = 43) was the most prevalent syndrome/anomaly. Eighty-three percent of patients received reversal of neuromuscular blockade, and total morphine equivalent narcotic dose averaged 0.19 mg/kg. Sixty-nine patients (23.0%) had an APE, most commonly hypoventilation (10%) and airway obstruction (8%). Other APEs included reintubation (4.7%) and laryngobronchospasm (3.3%). APE was associated with multiple intubation attempts (odds ratio [OR] = 6.6, P = .001), structural or functional airway anomaly (OR = 4.5, P < .001), operation >160 minutes (OR = 2.2, P = .04), narcotic dose >0.3 mg/kg (OR = 2.3, P = .03), inexperienced provider (OR = 2.1, P = .02), and no paralytic reversal administration (OR = 2.0, P = .049); weight between 9 and 13 kg was protective (OR = 0.5, P = .04). Patients were risk-stratified according to individual profiles as low, average, high, or extreme risk (APE 2.5%-91.7%) with excellent risk discrimination (C-statistic = 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

APE incidence was 23.0% after palatoplasty, with a 37-fold higher incidence in extreme-risk patients. Individualized risk assessment tools may enhance perioperative clinical decision making to mitigate complications.

Для цитирования: Basta Marten N, Fiadjoe John E, Woo Albert S, Peeples Kenneth N, Jackson Oksana A. Predicting Adverse Perioperative Events in Patients Undergoing Primary Cleft Palate Repair.. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1055665617744065.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.