MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313108

Медицинская библиотека · Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2018

Reaching cardiovascular prevention guideline targets with a polypill-based approach: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Selak Vanessa, Webster Ruth, Stepien Sandrine, Bullen Chris, Patel Anushka, Thom Simon, Arroll Bruce, Bots Michiel L, Brown Alex, Crengle Sue, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Elley C Raina, Grobbee Diederick E, Harwood Matire, Hillis Graham S, Laba Tracey-Lea, Neal Bruce, Peiris David, Rafter Natasha, Reid Christopher, Stanton Alice, Tonkin Andrew, Usherwood Tim, Wadham Angela, Rodgers Anthony

СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of polypill-based care on the achievement of 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline targets for blood pressure (BP), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and antiplatelet therapy.

METHODS

We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis of three randomised clinical trials that compared a strategy using a polypill containing aspirin, statin and antihypertensive therapy with usual care in patients with a prior cardiovascular disease (CVD) event or who were at high risk of their first event. Overall, the trials included 3140 patients from Australia, England, India, Ireland, the Netherlands and New Zealand (75% male, mean age 62 years and 76% with a prior CVD event). The primary outcome for this study was the proportion of people achieving ESC guideline targets for BP, LDL and antiplatelet therapy.

RESULTS

Those randomised to polypill-based care were more likely than those receiving usual care to achieve recommended targets for BP (62% vs 58%, risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.15), LDL (39% vs 34%, RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.25) and all three targets for BP, LDL and adherence to antiplatelet therapy (the latter only applicable to those with a prior CVD event) simultaneously (24% vs 19%, RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.47) at 12 months. There was no difference between groups in antiplatelet adherence (96% vs 96%, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.01). There was heterogeneity by baseline treatment intensity such that treatment effects increased with the fewer the number of treatments being taken at baseline: for patients taking 3, 2 and 0-1 treatment modalities the RRs for reaching all three guideline goals simultaneously were 1.10 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.30, 22% vs 20%), 1.62 (95% CI 1.09 to 2.42, 27% vs 17%) and 3.07 (95% CI 1.77 to 5.33, 35% vs 11%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypill-based therapy significantly improved the achievement of all three ESC targets for BP, LDL and antiplatelet therapy compared with usual care, particularly among those undertreated at baseline.

Для цитирования: Selak Vanessa, Webster Ruth, Stepien Sandrine, Bullen Chris, Patel Anushka, Thom Simon, Arroll Bruce, Bots Michiel L, Brown Alex, Crengle Sue, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Elley C Raina, Grobbee Diederick E, Harwood Matire, Hillis Graham S, Laba Tracey-Lea, Neal Bruce, Peiris David, Rafter Natasha, Reid Christopher, Stanton Alice, Tonkin Andrew, Usherwood Tim, Wadham Angela, Rodgers Anthony. Reaching cardiovascular prevention guideline targets with a polypill-based approach: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2018. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313108.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.