MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/infdis/175.supplement_1.s241

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of infectious diseases · 1997

Sequential and combined use of inactivated and oral poliovirus vaccines: Dolj District, Romania, 1992-1994.

Ion-Nedelcu N, Strebel P M, Toma F, Biberi-Moroeanu S, Combiescu M, Persu A, Aubert-Combiescu A, Plotkin S A, Sutter R W

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To determine the feasibility of a vaccination strategy that would reduce the risk of vaccine-associated paralysis while retaining a barrier against the spread of wild poliovirus, a 2-year project was undertaken using enhanced-potency inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) administered at 2 and 3 months of age followed by doses of both IPV and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) administered at 4 and 9 months of age. Vaccination coverage by 12 months of age with three or more doses of IPV and two doses of OPV among 16,566 infants eligible for vaccination was > 95% and > 80%, respectively. Among 51 children from whom blood samples were obtained 45 days after their third dose of IPV and first dose of OPV, 100% had serum neutralizing antibodies (reciprocal titer > or = 10) to all three poliovirus types. No cases of paralytic poliomyelitis due to either wild or vaccine-related strains were reported. The project demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and high immunogenicity of sequential use of IPV followed by OPV in Romania.

Для цитирования: Ion-Nedelcu N, Strebel P M, Toma F, Biberi-Moroeanu S, Combiescu M, Persu A, Aubert-Combiescu A, Plotkin S A, Sutter R W. Sequential and combined use of inactivated and oral poliovirus vaccines: Dolj District, Romania, 1992-1994.. The Journal of infectious diseases. 1997. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/175.supplement_1.s241.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.