MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.071

Медицинская библиотека · Biomaterials · 2005

In vivo evaluation of tetrahedral amorphous carbon.

LaVan David A, Padera Robert F, Friedmann Thomas A, Sullivan John P, Langer Robert, Kohane Daniel S

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The in vivo behavior and tissue reaction to tetrahedral amorphous carbon (ta-C) has been evaluated for periods of up to 6 months in SV129 mice. Two sample types were tested--silicon die coated with ta-C (n = 53) and micromachined particles (n = 40). The coated samples were compared to uncoated silicon die (n = 22). Die samples were implanted subcutaneously, and tissue reaction and capsule formation were evaluated at various time points. Micromachined particles of 1, 3, 10, and 30 microm were injected adjacent to the sciatic nerve, and tissue samples were examined histologically at various time points (4 days-6 months). Tissue reaction to ta-C was mild and was localized to the area of the injection or implantation. Samples with a higher ratio of 3-fold bonding appeared to shed material during the experiments; this was not observed on samples with a higher level of 4-fold bonding, nor on uncoated silicon die. The results strongly suggest that films with greater 4-fold bonding character (more diamond-like) are more resistant to in vivo fragmentation than films with higher 3-fold character (more graphitic).

Для цитирования: LaVan David A, Padera Robert F, Friedmann Thomas A, Sullivan John P, Langer Robert, Kohane Daniel S. In vivo evaluation of tetrahedral amorphous carbon.. Biomaterials. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.071.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.