MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/1357714031000114183

Медицинская библиотека · Sarcoma · 2003

A case of liposarcoma with peritonitis due to jejunal perforation.

Horiguchi Hisashi, Matsui Miwa, Yamamoto Tatsuo, Mochizuki Ryosuke, Uematsu Takeshi, Fujiwara Masachika, Ohse Hirotaka

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 21-year-old man, who had been treated for congenital dilatation of the bile duct 13 years previously, presented with an acute abdomen. The physical examination suggested peritonitis, and an emergent laparotomy was performed. A perforation was foundin the jejunum approximately 100 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz, followed by resection of a 60-cm jejunal segment. No tumorous lesions were found during the operation, and the resected jejunal segment showed only focal myxomatous thickening of the serosa. Despite intensive therapy, he died of uncontrollable septic shock 2 days after the operation. Unexpectedly, however, histological examination revealed a liposarcoma, showing an unclassifiable histology. From the distribution of the lesion and the histological findings, it is thought that a primary lesion was somewhere else, covered by severe adhesions due to the previous operation, and that the tumor cells spreading from it could have caused the jejunal perforation through vascular involvement. Although extremely rare, liposarcomas in the abdomen can cause intestinal perforation. It is important for both clinicians andpathologists to carefully investigate the cause of an unusual clinical presentation such as intestinal perforation.

Для цитирования: Horiguchi Hisashi, Matsui Miwa, Yamamoto Tatsuo, Mochizuki Ryosuke, Uematsu Takeshi, Fujiwara Masachika, Ohse Hirotaka. A case of liposarcoma with peritonitis due to jejunal perforation.. Sarcoma. 2003. DOI: 10.1080/1357714031000114183.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.