Long-Term Skeletal Changes After Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in Growing Children With Cleft Lip/Palate.

PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the skeletal changes after maxillary distraction osteogenesis (DO) in growing patients with cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Electronic databases, gray literature, and reference list searches were conducted. Articles reporting prospective and retrospective studies that included patients <16 years old (N ≥ 6) who had received DO surgery for correction of a midfacial hypoplasia due to CL/P, and the period of follow-up persisted >1 year were reviewed. The original articles were evaluated by 2 investigators to ensure that they met the selection criteria. A methodologic quality assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of selected studies. Twenty-six studies met the initial search criteria, and 9 articles included 101 growing patients with maxillary hypoplasia due to CL/P who received DO surgery were finally selected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The results showed that long term after maxillary advancement with DO, the horizontal relapse in A-point was <15% in 3 studies, 20% to 25% in 1 study, 30% to 35% in 3 studies, and >40% in 1 study. Totally, the range of horizontal relapse in A-point was 11.9% to 45.9%. Similarly, the relapse in SNA angle was <30% in 1 study, 30% to 40% in 3 studies, and >40% in 2 studies. Totally, the range of relapse in SNA was 25.7% to 77%. Two studies showed that the vertical relapse in A-point were 137% and 208%, and in the PNS point were 65% and 62.7%.

CONCLUSION

Although findings demonstrated that DO is an effective treatment method for severe maxillary hypoplasia in growing patients with CL/P, there is a relatively high amount of skeletal relapse both in horizontal and vertical dimension. Thus, the first proposed alternative for CL/P patients would be to select the correct primary procedure to decrease damage and avoid unnecessary scars. Then appropriate preoperative and postoperative care is necessary to prevent postoperative relapse. In addition, overcorrection also may be a possible alternative for compensation of postoperative relapse.