Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2015
Farmedial versus anteromedial portal drilling of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a computed tomography analysis.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Erdem Mehmet, Gulabi Deniz, Asil Kiyasettin, Erdem Ahmet Can
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The success of ACL reconstruction is predicated on a variety of factors. Tunnel placement plays one of the most significant roles in achieving knee kinematics and function. The purposes of this study were to compare femoral tunnel position, angle, length and posterior wall blow-out after ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons autograft through either a farmedial portal or an anteromedial portal technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 36 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between January 2014 and July 2014 in our institute, in a prospective, randomised cohort study. All the surgical procedures were performed by a sports fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon with experience in both portal reaming. The operated knees were evaluated with 0.5 mm fine CT scans of 3-D CT between days 3 and 5 postoperatively.
RESULTS: According to the 3-D CT measurements, the mean femoral tunnel length was significantly longer (p < 0.05) in the FAM group compared with the AM group. The femoral bone tunnel length averaged 34.2 ± 3.6 mm versus 36.6 ± 3.0 mm (p = 0.042) in AM and the FAM groups, respectively. The femoral tunnel position, as evaluated with use of the quadrant method, was more anterior in the FAM transportal technique group, and the difference between the two groups was significant (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: FAM tranportal drilling of the femoral tunnel creates longer and anterior femoral tunnels with regard to the AM portal drilling techniques. Additional studies with clinical outcomes are required for the clinical relevance of these techniques and to show which one is superior.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prospective randomised comparative cohort study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 36 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between January 2014 and July 2014 in our institute, in a prospective, randomised cohort study. All the surgical procedures were performed by a sports fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon with experience in both portal reaming. The operated knees were evaluated with 0.5 mm fine CT scans of 3-D CT between days 3 and 5 postoperatively.
RESULTS: According to the 3-D CT measurements, the mean femoral tunnel length was significantly longer (p < 0.05) in the FAM group compared with the AM group. The femoral bone tunnel length averaged 34.2 ± 3.6 mm versus 36.6 ± 3.0 mm (p = 0.042) in AM and the FAM groups, respectively. The femoral tunnel position, as evaluated with use of the quadrant method, was more anterior in the FAM transportal technique group, and the difference between the two groups was significant (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: FAM tranportal drilling of the femoral tunnel creates longer and anterior femoral tunnels with regard to the AM portal drilling techniques. Additional studies with clinical outcomes are required for the clinical relevance of these techniques and to show which one is superior.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prospective randomised comparative cohort study.