MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103718

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022

Continuously protracted infusion of cisatracurium besilate in patients with ARDS.

Yuan Ziming, Pan Lei, Wang Yang, Wang Wei

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is still associated with significant mortality, especially the elderly and those with comorbidities are at highest risk of death. Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are used in a large but highly variable proportion of patients with ARDS.

CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of one critically ill patient with serious ARDS, because of virus pneumonia. In spite of the reduced tidal volume to 4-6 mL/kg of predicted body weight (PBW) and prone position were applied timely, the irresistible progress of disease leaded to an amazing prolonged application of deep sedation and analgesia, as well as NMBA, for the purpose of lung-protective mechanical ventilation.

RESULT: The clinical and biochemical parameters guided us toward the recognition that cisatracurium, bolus of 0.1 mg/kg followed by a median infusion rate of 1.91 (1.43-9.52) μg/kg.min, combined with continuous infusion of midazolam 3.43 (2.06-6.17) mg/kg.d and remifentanil 3.79 (3.43-8.57) μg/kg.h is efficacious and suitable for continuous muscle paralysis.

CONCLUSION

The intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) was inevitable. Besides, an increased demand on drug concentration with the extension of medication time was observed as well.

Для цитирования: Yuan Ziming, Pan Lei, Wang Yang, Wang Wei. Continuously protracted infusion of cisatracurium besilate in patients with ARDS.. Annals of medicine and surgery (2012). 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103718.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.