MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/icb.0000000000000874

Медицинская библиотека · Retinal cases & brief reports · 2021

FUNDUS AUTOFLUORESCENCE PREDICTING GROWTH OF A CHOROIDAL OSTEOMA IN A 13-YEAR-OLD GIRL.

Desai Symmarana U, Desai Uday R

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To describe multimodal imaging findings, including fundus autofluorescence, in a patient with a growing choroidal osteoma.

METHODS

Case report.

RESULTS

A 13-year-old girl presented with an asymptomatic lesion in the superonasal macula of her left eye. Vision was correctable to 20/20 in both eyes, and the only significant finding on examination was the yellow flat lesion in the left macula. It measured 0.8-disk areas in size. Ocular coherence tomography showed a space occupying lesion in the choroid that had horizontal hyper-reflective lines consistent with cancellous bone. Re-examination in a year showed enlargement. Fundus autofluorescence showed no abnormalities in either eye. Ultrasonography showed a hyper-reflective lesion with associated shadowing that was consistent with a choroidal osteoma.

CONCLUSION

Normal fundus autofluorescence was seen in this young girl with a growing choroidal osteoma. Fundus autofluorescence is a proxy for the health of the retinal pigment epithelium. Normal retinal pigment epithelium is the only factor found to be predictive of future growth of a choroidal osteoma. This noninvasive test may prove useful as a guide to determine frequency of examinations especially in younger patients who might be prone to more rapid growth.

Для цитирования: Desai Symmarana U, Desai Uday R. FUNDUS AUTOFLUORESCENCE PREDICTING GROWTH OF A CHOROIDAL OSTEOMA IN A 13-YEAR-OLD GIRL.. Retinal cases & brief reports. 2021. DOI: 10.1097/icb.0000000000000874.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.