MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.676

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery · 2012

The effects of balloon dilation laryngoplasty in children with congenital heart disease.

Collins William O, Kalantar Nader, Rohrs Hillary B, Silva Rodrigo C

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utility of performing balloon dilation laryngoplasty of subglottic stenosis (SGS) in children with underlying congenital heart disease (CHD).

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic health center.

PATIENTS: Children with an underlying diagnosis of CHD who subsequently underwent balloon dilation laryngoplasty for SGS from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2011.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical improvement and avoidance of tracheotomy.

RESULTS

We identified 16 children who had a diagnosis of CHD and underwent direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. Five patients (3 girls and 2 boys) underwent a total of 11 balloon dilations for SGS. Their ages at initial dilation ranged from 1 to 4 months. All 5 patients had grade III SGS. Only 1 patient required a salvage tracheotomy for a thick glottic web and associated SGS after her first balloon dilation failed to improve airway patency. The remaining 4 patients have had long-term success in avoiding tracheotomy with symptomatic improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Balloon dilation represents a valuable treatment option in patients with CHD and SGS in whom a tracheostomy should be avoided.

Для цитирования: Collins William O, Kalantar Nader, Rohrs Hillary B, Silva Rodrigo C. The effects of balloon dilation laryngoplasty in children with congenital heart disease.. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.676.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.