MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00043764-198812000-00015

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association · 1988

An epidemiologic study of respiratory health effects in a group of North Carolina furniture workers.

Goldsmith D F, Shy C M

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Woodworking is known to be associated with nasal cancer and with western red cedar asthma, but research is inconsistent with regard to respiratory health effects among furniture workers. The authors tested the hypotheses that employment in a North Carolina hardwood furniture plant was related to the prevalence of respiratory symptoms and to impairment of pulmonary function. Chronic symptom prevalence generally showed no significant differences between wood dust jobs and control exposures; however, frequent sneezing and eye irritation were significantly (P less than .05) correlated with wood dust exposed jobs; in both cases the prevalence odds ratio was 4.0. Peak flow was the only pulmonary function measure that correlated significantly (P = .0345) with wood dust employment. The difference in forced vital capacity suggested a weak association with current employment in finishing jobs, whereas the difference in peak flow showed a modest correlation with the fraction of particulate less than 10 microns. The relevance of the present associations to regulatory changes and research needs is discussed.

Для цитирования: Goldsmith D F, Shy C M. An epidemiologic study of respiratory health effects in a group of North Carolina furniture workers.. Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association. 1988. DOI: 10.1097/00043764-198812000-00015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.