The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2019
Antifungal activity and killing kinetics of anidulafungin, caspofungin and amphotericin B against Candida auris.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dudiuk Catiana, Berrio Indira, Leonardelli Florencia, Morales-Lopez Soraya, Theill Laura, Macedo Daiana, Yesid-Rodriguez José, Salcedo Soraya, Marin Adriana, Gamarra Soledad, Garcia-Effron Guillermo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Candida auris is an emerging MDR pathogen. It shows reduced susceptibility to azole drugs and, in some strains, high amphotericin B MICs have been described. For these reasons, echinocandins were proposed as first-line treatment for C. auris infections. However, information on how echinocandins and amphotericin B act against this species is lacking.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to establish the killing kinetics of anidulafungin, caspofungin and amphotericin B against C. auris by time-kill methodology and to determine if these antifungals behave as fungicidal or fungistatic agents against this species.
METHODS: The susceptibility of 50 C. auris strains was studied. Nine strains were selected (based on echinocandin MICs) to be further studied. Minimal fungicidal concentrations, in vitro dose-response and time-kill patterns were determined.
RESULTS: Echinocandins showed lower MIC values than amphotericin B (geometric mean of 0.12 and 0.94 mg/L, respectively). Anidulafungin and caspofungin showed no fungicidal activity at any concentration (maximum log decreases in cfu/mL between 1.34 and 2.22). On the other hand, amphotericin B showed fungicidal activity, but at high concentrations (≥2.00 mg/L). In addition, the tested polyene was faster than echinocandins at killing 50% of the initial inoculum (0.92 versus >8.00 h, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Amphotericin B was the only agent regarded as fungicidal against C. auris. Moreover, C. auris should be considered tolerant to caspofungin and anidulafungin considering that their MFC:MIC ratios were mostly ≥32 and that after 6 h of incubation the starting inoculum was not reduced in >90%.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to establish the killing kinetics of anidulafungin, caspofungin and amphotericin B against C. auris by time-kill methodology and to determine if these antifungals behave as fungicidal or fungistatic agents against this species.
METHODS: The susceptibility of 50 C. auris strains was studied. Nine strains were selected (based on echinocandin MICs) to be further studied. Minimal fungicidal concentrations, in vitro dose-response and time-kill patterns were determined.
RESULTS: Echinocandins showed lower MIC values than amphotericin B (geometric mean of 0.12 and 0.94 mg/L, respectively). Anidulafungin and caspofungin showed no fungicidal activity at any concentration (maximum log decreases in cfu/mL between 1.34 and 2.22). On the other hand, amphotericin B showed fungicidal activity, but at high concentrations (≥2.00 mg/L). In addition, the tested polyene was faster than echinocandins at killing 50% of the initial inoculum (0.92 versus >8.00 h, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Amphotericin B was the only agent regarded as fungicidal against C. auris. Moreover, C. auris should be considered tolerant to caspofungin and anidulafungin considering that their MFC:MIC ratios were mostly ≥32 and that after 6 h of incubation the starting inoculum was not reduced in >90%.