DOI 10.1007/s12029-026-01460-8
Real-World Study of anti-PD-1 Combined with Regorafenib and Raltitrexed as Third-Line Therapy in Colorectal Cancer.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This studyaimed to assess the effectiveness of combining the anti-PD-1 drug with regorafenib and raltitrexed as a third-line treatment for mCRC.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer between December 2021 and December 2022, who had previously failed treatment and subsequently received anti-PD-1 drugs combined with regorafenib and raltitrexed as third-line therapy. The primary efficacy endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS
A total of 57 patients were enrolled in the study. The ORR and DCR were 14.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.1–23.1) and 50.9% (95% CI: 37.9–63.9), respectively. No patient achieved CR, 8 (14.1%) patients exhibited PR, 21 (36.8%) patients had SD, and 28 (49.1%) patients experienced PD. At the data cutoff, 23 (40.4%) deaths had occurred; with a median follow-up of 11 months (range 1-32.6). The median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI: 1.7 to 6.7), and the median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 3.0 to 18.0). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 50 (87.7%) patients, with the most common being palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (25, 43.9%), followed by a rash (7, 12.3%), and hypertension (5, 8.8%).
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of anti-PD-1 drugs, regorafenib, and raltitrexed demonstrated promising antitumor efficacy and acceptable safety in patients with metastatic CRC, offering an alternative approach to optimize combination strategies in the management of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.