External fixation in the treatment of tibial pilon fractures: comparison of two frames in torsion.

BACKGROUND

Ankle spanning external fixation has become the initial treatment of choice for complex tibial pilon fractures. Many fixator designs exist, but their biomechanical performance has not been studied extensively for this application. The goal of the present study was to compare the torsional performance of two commercially available frames, the Orthofix XCaliber and the Howmedica Hoffmann II.

METHODS

The XCaliber and the Hoffmann II were each applied to six fresh cadaver lower extremities and were loaded in a materials testing machine. Strain gauges were attached to the anteromedial cortex of the distal tibia, and each specimen underwent torsional and axial load testing, with and without the external fixator. A simulated pilon fracture was created, and torsional testing was repeated.

RESULTS

Results indicated that the XCaliber was significantly more rigid in internal rotation than the Hoffmann II, before (49%) and after (41%) creation of the pilon fracture. Despite the XCaliber's increased rigidity relative to the Hoffmann II (22% to 31%) in external rotation, statistical significance was not attained. Both fixators reduced strain (25% to 85%) at the anteromedial cortex upon torsional testing, but no significant differences between the two frames were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that the XCaliber has mechanical advantages over the Hoffmann II in terms of torsional rigidity for a tibial pilon fracture.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Increased rigidity of the XCaliber could potentially lead to decreased time to union, and a lower incidence of pin loosening and would prove beneficial in a setting in which the external fixator is used as the definitive fixation.