MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/rcs.1555

Медицинская библиотека · The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2013

Accuracy of screw placement and radiation dose in navigated dorsal instrumentation of the cervical spine: a prospective cohort study.

Kraus Michael, von dem Berge Stephanie, Perl Mario, Krischak Gert, Weckbach Sebastian

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Dorsal cervical spinal fusion is a challenging procedure in fracture fixation. There is limited information in the literature about computer navigation using lateral mass screws in cases of spinal trauma.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospective database covering an 8 year period. All patients who received a dorsal spinal fusion due to a fracture of the cervical spine were included. Outcome parameters were screw accuracy, duration of surgery, the radiation emitted and intra-/postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients, who received 67 screws (44 navigated vs 23 conventionally inserted screws) were included. Three-dimensional (3D)-based computer navigation prolonged the duration of surgery but helped to reduce the radiation emitted and led to significantly increased accuracy of screw positioning.

CONCLUSION

Computer navigation can increase the accuracy of lateral mass screws in spinal trauma. It prolongs the surgical procedure but reduces the emission of radiation significantly.

Для цитирования: Kraus Michael, von dem Berge Stephanie, Perl Mario, Krischak Gert, Weckbach Sebastian. Accuracy of screw placement and radiation dose in navigated dorsal instrumentation of the cervical spine: a prospective cohort study.. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS. 2013. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1555.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.