MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/ejcts/ezu253

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2014

Determinants of false-negative results in non-small-cell lung cancer staging by endobronchial ultrasound-guided needle aspiration.

Sanz-Santos José, Serra Mireia, Gallego Miguel, Montón Concepción, Cosio Borja, Sauleda Jaume, Fernández-Villar Alberto, García-Luján Ricardo, de Miguel Eduardo, Cordovilla Rosa, Varela Gonzalo, Cases Enrique, Andreo Felipe, Monsó Eduard

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

False-negative results of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in non-small-cell lung cancer staging have shown significant variability in previous studies. The aim of this study was to identify procedure- and tumour-related determinants of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration false-negative results.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study that included non-small-cell lung cancer patients staged as N0/N1 by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration and undergoing therapeutic surgery. The frequency of false-negative results in the mediastinum was calculated. Procedure-related, first, and tumour-related, second, determinants of false-negative results in stations reachable and non-reachable by endobronchial ultrasound were determined by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

False-negative endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration results were identified in 23 of 165 enrolled patients (13.9%), mainly in stations reachable by endobronchial ultrasound (17 cases, 10.3%). False-negative results were related to the extensiveness of endobronchial ultrasound sampling: their prevalence was low (2.4%) when sampling of three mediastinal stations was satisfactory, but rose above 10% when this requirement was not fulfilled (P = 0.043). In the multivariate analysis, abnormal mediastinum on computer tomography/positron emission tomography [odds ratio (OR) 7.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.19-27.51, P = 0.001] and extensiveness of satisfactory sampling of mediastinal stations (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.89, P = 0.026) were statistically significant risk factors for false-negative results in stations reachable by endobronchial ultrasound. False-negative results in non-reachable nodes were associated with a left-sided location of the tumour (OR 10.11, 95% CI 1.17-87.52, P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of false-negative ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration results were observed in nearly 15% of non-small-cell lung cancer patients but in only 3% when satisfactory samples were obtained from three mediastinal stations. False-negative results in stations reachable by endobronchial ultrasound were associated with the extensiveness of sampling, and in stations out of reach of endobronchial ultrasound with left-sided tumours. These results suggest that satisfactory sampling of at least three mediastinal stations by EBUS-TBNA may be a quality criterion to be recommended for EBUS-TBNA staging.

Для цитирования: Sanz-Santos José, Serra Mireia, Gallego Miguel, Montón Concepción, Cosio Borja, Sauleda Jaume, Fernández-Villar Alberto, García-Luján Ricardo, de Miguel Eduardo, Cordovilla Rosa, Varela Gonzalo, Cases Enrique, Andreo Felipe, Monsó Eduard. Determinants of false-negative results in non-small-cell lung cancer staging by endobronchial ultrasound-guided needle aspiration.. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu253.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.