MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf02752219

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of pediatrics · 1994

Etiological agents of acute poliomyelitis in south India.

Deivanayagam N, Nedunchelian K, Vasudevan S, Ramamoorthy N, Rathnam S R, Mala N, Ashok T P, Ahmed S S

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study was done to identify the specific etiological agents that cause acute poliomyelitis (APM). All the children newly diagnosed clinically as APM at the Institute of Child Health, Madras, during the period May 1988 to May 1989 were recruited. Stool specimen collection, transportation and identification of viruses by culture were done by standard procedures. The total number of children recruited was 312. Specimens were contaminated/insufficient in 10. Analysis was done for 302 cases. Polio virus type II was identified in 25.5% children, type I in 18.5%, type III in 15.9%, multiple polioviruses in 6.3% and non-polio enteroviruses (NPEV) in 20.2% cases. No virus was identified in 13.6%. Among the APM cases clinically diagnosed, the proportion of NPEV has increased considerably from 5% in 1984 to 20.2% in 1988-89. The age distribution was not significantly different between polio viruses and NPEV. The distribution of polio viruses and NPEV did not differ significantly in relation to immunization status, source of water supply, method of excreta disposal and the clinical types. For surveillance and control/eradication program of poliomyelitis, laboratory confirmation is essential.

Для цитирования: Deivanayagam N, Nedunchelian K, Vasudevan S, Ramamoorthy N, Rathnam S R, Mala N, Ashok T P, Ahmed S S. Etiological agents of acute poliomyelitis in south India.. Indian journal of pediatrics. 1994. DOI: 10.1007/bf02752219.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.