Gastro hep advances · 2022
Evaluation of Heterologous Effects of Travel Vaccines in Colorectal Cancer: A Database Study and a Cautionary Tale.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Herweijer Eva, Schwamborn Klaus, Bollaerts Kaatje, Spillmann Adrian, Cattaert Tom, Verstraeten Thomas, Hoogstraate Janet
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recently, cholera vaccine use was shown to be associated with a reduced risk of death in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). However, evidence on heterologous effects of travel vaccines is limited. The aim of this study was to study heterologous effects of travel vaccines in patients with CRC.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective database study on a cohort of CRC patients in Sweden and their postdiagnostic use of travel medications between July 2005 and December 2017. We obtained data from national registries on number of CRC diagnosis, death from CRC or other causes, age at diagnosis, and postdiagnostic use of travel vaccines and malaria prophylaxis. The Cox regression model was used to calculate incidence rate and incidence rate ratios of CRC-related and all-cause mortality by postdiagnostic travel medication status.
RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-five patients exposed to travel vaccines and malaria prophylaxis and 73,466 patients not exposed to travel medications were identified. CRC-related mortality was lowered in the exposed patients compared to the unexposed patients, irrespective of the travel medications used. The incidence rate ratios for CRC-related mortality and overall mortality were comparable.
CONCLUSION: We postulated that patients in better health were likely to travel more frequently than patients with poor health, leading to a healthy user bias. The results suggested the same, as similar reduced mortality risks were found for all the investigated travel medications, lowering the biological plausibility of truly protective effect from post-therapeutic use of any of the travel medication studied. We advocate the use of multiple negative exposure controls and to exercise caution while drawing conclusions from travel vaccine research.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective database study on a cohort of CRC patients in Sweden and their postdiagnostic use of travel medications between July 2005 and December 2017. We obtained data from national registries on number of CRC diagnosis, death from CRC or other causes, age at diagnosis, and postdiagnostic use of travel vaccines and malaria prophylaxis. The Cox regression model was used to calculate incidence rate and incidence rate ratios of CRC-related and all-cause mortality by postdiagnostic travel medication status.
RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-five patients exposed to travel vaccines and malaria prophylaxis and 73,466 patients not exposed to travel medications were identified. CRC-related mortality was lowered in the exposed patients compared to the unexposed patients, irrespective of the travel medications used. The incidence rate ratios for CRC-related mortality and overall mortality were comparable.
CONCLUSION: We postulated that patients in better health were likely to travel more frequently than patients with poor health, leading to a healthy user bias. The results suggested the same, as similar reduced mortality risks were found for all the investigated travel medications, lowering the biological plausibility of truly protective effect from post-therapeutic use of any of the travel medication studied. We advocate the use of multiple negative exposure controls and to exercise caution while drawing conclusions from travel vaccine research.