MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/tropej/fmp092

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of tropical pediatrics · 2009

A pilot study of comparison of BCPAP vs. VCPAP in preterm infants with early onset respiratory distress.

Tagare Amit, Kadam Sandeep, Vaidya Umesh, Pandit Anand, Patole Sanjay

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Bubble continuous positive airway pressure (BCPAP) is a low-cost nasal CPAP delivery system with potential benefits for developing nations. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of BCPAP with ventilator CPAP (VCPAP) in preterm neonates with moderate respiratory distress.

METHODS

In a pilot randomized controlled trial, 30 preterm neonates (gestation <37 weeks) with Silverman-Anderson score between 5 to 7 and oxygen requirement >30% within first 6 h of life were randomly allocated to BCPAP or VCPAP after informed parental consent. Proportion of neonates with success or failure, while using the allocated mode of CPAP delivery (primary outcome) was compared.

RESULTS

The success rate was comparable [VCPAP: 80% (12/15) vs. BCPAP: 87% (13/15)] between the two groups. Dislodgement was commonest problem with equal frequency [10/15, (67%)] in each group.

CONCLUSION

BCPAP appears to be a promising method of CPAP delivery in preterm neonates with moderate respiratory distress.

Для цитирования: Tagare Amit, Kadam Sandeep, Vaidya Umesh, Pandit Anand, Patole Sanjay. A pilot study of comparison of BCPAP vs. VCPAP in preterm infants with early onset respiratory distress.. Journal of tropical pediatrics. 2009. DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmp092.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.