MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1510/icvts.2010.240168

Медицинская библиотека · Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2010

Intentional and successful use of a marginal donor heart with surgically-corrected interventricular communication.

Lebreton Guillaume, Pozzi Matteo, D'Alessandro Cosimo, Leprince Pascal

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We describe a case of heart transplantation (HTX) performed using a heart from a 20-year-old donor who underwent surgical closure of a ventricular septal defect during childhood. Our 26-year-old patient was successfully discharged to a rehabilitation centre on day 20 post-transplantation. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an HTX performed with a 'redo' donor heart with previous surgical correction of a congenital heart defect. The widespread use of HTX as a therapeutic option is currently limited by the increase in number of patients listed annually for this procedure. The concomitant lack of organ donors has led to the concept of 'marginal donor' to broaden the classic standard criteria of donor suitability, but these extended criteria do not consider the possibility of using hearts that have undergone surgical correction of simple congenital heart defects. There has been a considerable increase in the grown-up congenital heart disease population over the past 20 years. We discuss the feasibility of using these hearts for transplantation and consider the limitations and precautions of such practice.

Для цитирования: Lebreton Guillaume, Pozzi Matteo, D'Alessandro Cosimo, Leprince Pascal. Intentional and successful use of a marginal donor heart with surgically-corrected interventricular communication.. Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2010.240168.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.