Thymic Lesions in Myasthenia Gravis: A Clinicopathological Study from India.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVES
Thymic pathology is common in Myasthenia Gravis(MG) and plays a crucial role in its pathogenesis and clinical outcome. This study aims to discuss the clinicohistopathological spectrum of thymic lesions in MG.
METHODS
In this retrospective study, MG patients who underwent thymectomy from 2011 to 2020 were included. Clinical, radiological, serological, and histopathological details are described.
RESULTS
Of 83 patients(F = 45; M = 38), 7(8%) had ocular myasthenia, and the remaining 76(92%) had the generalized form. At onset, the median age was 36 years(M = 44; F = 31). AChR antibody was positive in 71/79 patients. RNST showed decrement response in 68/78 patients. The histopathological study demonstrated thymoma in 44(53%), thymic hyperplasias [32(38%)], involuted thymus [5(6%)], thymic cyst (1) and thymic lipoma (1). WHO grading of thymoma: B2- 48%, AB-18%, B-18%, B3-14%, A-2.3%. In these, capsular infiltration was noted in 11/44, 9 had focal and 2 had diffuse infiltration. Active germinal centers were present in 20/32 patients with thymic hyperplasia and 4/44 with thymoma. Thymomas were predominant in males and thymic hyperplasia in females. The age of onset and antibody positivity rate was higher in thymoma patients.
CONCLUSION
In our cohort, there is a female preponderance. Thymoma was the commonest pathology followed by hyperplasia. We observed earlier onset of myasthenia in females. AChR antibody positivity rate was more frequent in thymomas. This study indicates that clinico-radiological evaluation adequately supported by serology and histopathology can effectively recognize the type of thymic pathology that can guide these patients' treatment planning, management, prognosis and follow-up.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.