The British journal of ophthalmology · 2002
Evaluation of the validity and reliability of A-scan ultrasound biometry with a single use disposable cover.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cass K, Thompson C M, Tromans C, Wood I C J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The UK Medical Devices Agency has suggested that ophthalmic practitioners should, where practicable and not compromising clinical outcome, restrict corneal contact devices to single patient use to minimise a remote theoretical risk of transmission of new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD). This study reports on a modified technique of ultrasound A-scan biometry that complies with the MDA recommendations.
METHODS: The right eyes of 37 consecutive hospital patients had a series of biometry readings taken with a Humphrey 820 A-scan instrument with a plane wave transducer use d conventionally and with the addition of a disposable latex cover.
RESULTS: Intrasessional repeatability of axial length measurements was similar for conventional readings--mean difference 0.027 mm, 95% confidence intervals (CI) +/- 0.44 mm and those taken with a disposable cover (0.028 mm, CI +/- 0.38). Intersessional repeatability was equivalent with (0.002 mm, CI +.- 0.51) and without a cover (0.03 mm, CI +/- 0.51). Readings with a cover were not significantly different from those without (paired t test; p >0.05), but tended to be greater (mean difference 0.085 mm, CI +/- 0.60).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that corneal contact biometry with a disposable cover is a viable and theoretically safer alternative to the conventional technique.
METHODS: The right eyes of 37 consecutive hospital patients had a series of biometry readings taken with a Humphrey 820 A-scan instrument with a plane wave transducer use d conventionally and with the addition of a disposable latex cover.
RESULTS: Intrasessional repeatability of axial length measurements was similar for conventional readings--mean difference 0.027 mm, 95% confidence intervals (CI) +/- 0.44 mm and those taken with a disposable cover (0.028 mm, CI +/- 0.38). Intersessional repeatability was equivalent with (0.002 mm, CI +.- 0.51) and without a cover (0.03 mm, CI +/- 0.51). Readings with a cover were not significantly different from those without (paired t test; p >0.05), but tended to be greater (mean difference 0.085 mm, CI +/- 0.60).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that corneal contact biometry with a disposable cover is a viable and theoretically safer alternative to the conventional technique.