Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2017
Calcium channel blockers for lung function improvement in asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chiu Kam Yu, Li Jian Guo, Lin Ying
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: For decades, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have been believed to play a role in asthma treatment. However, the clinical efficacy of CCBs for lung function improvement in patients with asthma has not been qualitatively evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of CCBs vs placebo on lung function test results in adults with asthma.
METHODS: Various databases were systematically searched to identify all randomized clinical trials with adults with asthma. We aimed to assess the influence of CCBs on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and provocative concentration of bronchoconstrictive agents causing a 20% decrease in FEV1 (PC20) compared with a placebo. All effect estimates were pooled by the generic inverse variance method with random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and heterogeneity investigation were performed.
RESULTS: Thirty eligible articles with 301 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our results revealed that in a standard exercise test CCBs could produce a mean maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 of 11.56% (95% confidence interval, 8.97%-14.16%; P < .001) and an increase in postdose FEV1 by 80 mL (95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.15 mL; P = .01). However, there was no statistical significance for CCBs in postdose FVC, PEFR, or PC20 of histamine and methacholine.
CONCLUSION: CCBs may be beneficial for lung function improvement in asthma, especially in exercise-induced asthma. However, there is a lack of evidence for CCBs protecting asthma patients from chemical irritation.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of CCBs vs placebo on lung function test results in adults with asthma.
METHODS: Various databases were systematically searched to identify all randomized clinical trials with adults with asthma. We aimed to assess the influence of CCBs on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and provocative concentration of bronchoconstrictive agents causing a 20% decrease in FEV1 (PC20) compared with a placebo. All effect estimates were pooled by the generic inverse variance method with random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and heterogeneity investigation were performed.
RESULTS: Thirty eligible articles with 301 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our results revealed that in a standard exercise test CCBs could produce a mean maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 of 11.56% (95% confidence interval, 8.97%-14.16%; P < .001) and an increase in postdose FEV1 by 80 mL (95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.15 mL; P = .01). However, there was no statistical significance for CCBs in postdose FVC, PEFR, or PC20 of histamine and methacholine.
CONCLUSION: CCBs may be beneficial for lung function improvement in asthma, especially in exercise-induced asthma. However, there is a lack of evidence for CCBs protecting asthma patients from chemical irritation.