MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004217

Медицинская библиотека · Critical care medicine · 2020

Moderate Certainty Evidence Suggests the Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Does Not Decrease Hypoxia When Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy in the Peri-Intubation Period: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Chaudhuri Dipayan, Granton David, Wang Dominic Xiang, Einav Sharon, Helviz Yigal, Mauri Tommaso, Ricard Jean-Damien, Mancebo Jordi, Frat Jean-Pierre, Jog Sameer, Hernandez Gonzalo, Maggiore Salvatore M, Hodgson Carol, Jaber Samir, Brochard Laurent, Burns Karen E A, Rochwerg Bram

СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The role of high-flow nasal cannula during and before intubation is unclear despite a number of randomized clinical trials. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the benefits of high-flow nasal cannula in the peri-intubation period.

DATA SOURCES: We performed a comprehensive search of relevant databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science).

STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized clinical trials that compared high-flow nasal cannula to other noninvasive oxygen delivery systems in the peri-intubation period.

DATA EXTRACTION: Our primary outcome was severe desaturation (defined as peripheral oxygen saturation reading < 80% during intubation). Secondary outcomes included peri-intubation complications, apneic time, PaO2 before and after intubation, PaCO2 after intubation, ICU length of stay, and short-term mortality.

DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 10 randomized clinical trials (n = 1,017 patients). High-flow nasal cannula had no effect on the occurrence rate of peri-intubation hypoxemia (relative risk, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.68-1.42; 0.3% absolute risk reduction, moderate certainty), serious complications (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.06), apneic time (mean difference, 10.3 s higher with high-flow nasal cannula; 95% CI, 11.0 s lower to 31.7 s higher), PaO2 measured after preoxygenation (mean difference, 3.6 mm Hg higher; 95% CI, 3.5 mm Hg lower to 10.7 mm Hg higher), or PaO2 measured after intubation (mean difference, 27.0 mm Hg higher; 95% CI, 13.2 mm Hg lower to 67.2 mm Hg higher), when compared with conventional oxygen therapy. There was also no effect on postintubation PaCO2, ICU length of stay, or 28-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

We found moderate-to-low certainty evidence that the use of high-flow nasal cannula likely has no effect on severe desaturation, serious complications, apneic time, oxygenation, ICU length of stay, or overall survival when used in the peri-intubation period when compared with conventional oxygen therapy.

Для цитирования: Chaudhuri Dipayan, Granton David, Wang Dominic Xiang, Einav Sharon, Helviz Yigal, Mauri Tommaso, Ricard Jean-Damien, Mancebo Jordi, Frat Jean-Pierre, Jog Sameer, Hernandez Gonzalo, Maggiore Salvatore M, Hodgson Carol, Jaber Samir, Brochard Laurent, Burns Karen E A, Rochwerg Bram. Moderate Certainty Evidence Suggests the Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Does Not Decrease Hypoxia When Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy in the Peri-Intubation Period: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Critical care medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004217.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.