Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology · 1995
Effects of plain and controlled-ileal-release budesonide formulations in experimental ileitis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boyd A J, Sherman I A, Saibil F G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Budesonide combines a topical anti-inflammatory activity with high first-pass hepatic extraction. This study compared the effects of plain and controlled-ileal-release (CIR) formulations of budesonide on intestinal inflammation.
METHODS: Ileitis was induced in hamsters by an intraluminal injection of trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid. Inflammation was assessed histologically and by measuring mastocytosis and myloperoxidase activity. Adrenal-pituitary axis suppression was assessed by radio-immunoassay of plasma cortisol. Animals received budesonide (200 or 800 micrograms/kg/day), CIR budesonide (200 micrograms/kg/day), or placebo.
RESULTS: Plain budesonide (200 micrograms/kg/day) did not reduce intestinal inflammation despite significantly lowered plasma cortisol levels. Plain budesonide (800 micrograms/kg/day), on the other hand, significantly reduced intestinal inflammation but further decreased plasma cortisol levels. CIR budesonide (200 micrograms/kg/day) was as effective in reducing inflammation as plain budesonide (800 micrograms/kg/day).
CONCLUSIONS: CIR budesonide was significantly more effective in reducing intestinal inflammation than plain budesonide. These results suggest that the site of delivery influences the effectiveness of budesonide and that local (topical) rather than systemic action of this compound is primarily responsible for its anti-inflammatory effect.
METHODS: Ileitis was induced in hamsters by an intraluminal injection of trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid. Inflammation was assessed histologically and by measuring mastocytosis and myloperoxidase activity. Adrenal-pituitary axis suppression was assessed by radio-immunoassay of plasma cortisol. Animals received budesonide (200 or 800 micrograms/kg/day), CIR budesonide (200 micrograms/kg/day), or placebo.
RESULTS: Plain budesonide (200 micrograms/kg/day) did not reduce intestinal inflammation despite significantly lowered plasma cortisol levels. Plain budesonide (800 micrograms/kg/day), on the other hand, significantly reduced intestinal inflammation but further decreased plasma cortisol levels. CIR budesonide (200 micrograms/kg/day) was as effective in reducing inflammation as plain budesonide (800 micrograms/kg/day).
CONCLUSIONS: CIR budesonide was significantly more effective in reducing intestinal inflammation than plain budesonide. These results suggest that the site of delivery influences the effectiveness of budesonide and that local (topical) rather than systemic action of this compound is primarily responsible for its anti-inflammatory effect.