MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0218492314526396

Медицинская библиотека · Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals · 2014

A risk factor for kinked middle lobar bronchus following right upper lobectomy.

Masuda Yoshiko, Marutsuka Takashi, Suzuki Makoto

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Kinking of the middle lobar bronchus is sometimes observed after a right upper lobectomy, but prevention and treatment have not been established. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for a kinked middle lobar bronchus causing postoperative middle lobe atelectasis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 35 patients who underwent a right upper lobectomy in our hospital. Demographic and preoperative variables were compared in 4 patients with postoperative middle lobe atelectasis and kinking of the middle lobar bronchus and 31 without postoperative middle lobe atelectasis, determined by bronchoscopy and computed tomography findings.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, lung function test results, or volume ratio of the right upper lobe. A shorter distance from the carina to the middle lobe orifice was the only risk factor for a kinked middle lobar bronchus identified (40.25 ± 2.45 vs. 48.06 ± 4.78 mm, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

A short distance from the carina to the middle lobe orifice could be a risk factor for kinking of the middle lobar bronchus in postoperative middle lobe atelectasis after right upper lobectomy.

Для цитирования: Masuda Yoshiko, Marutsuka Takashi, Suzuki Makoto. A risk factor for kinked middle lobar bronchus following right upper lobectomy.. Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0218492314526396.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.