MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.anl.2007.07.005

Медицинская библиотека · Auris, nasus, larynx · 2007

Clinical experience with collagen injection of the vocal fold: a study of 155 patients.

Kimura Miwako, Nito Takaharu, Sakakibara Ken-Ichi, Tayama Niro, Niimi Seiji

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the results of laryngeal collagen injection.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective study of patients who had undergone laryngeal collagen injection.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A retrospective review of 275 patients treated with collagen injection and a review of the relevant literature on the results of treatment were presented. Follow-up studies were performed for at least 3 months on 155 patients. The patients' voice quality was assessed by perceptual voice analysis using the GRBAS scale, and their vocal function was assessed by acoustic and aerodynamic measures (maximal phonation time and mean flow rate). Assessments were performed before and after collagen injection.

RESULTS

Mean objective measures and clinician's perceptual ratings demonstrated measurable improvement in vocal function and voice quality after collagen injection. There were no major complications and no hypersensitivity reactions.

CONCLUSION

As an outpatient office procedure, collagen injection offers a simple, efficient and effective treatment for dysphonia. Various aspects of the procedure for anesthesia, injection techniques, and patient selection are discussed.

Для цитирования: Kimura Miwako, Nito Takaharu, Sakakibara Ken-Ichi, Tayama Niro, Niimi Seiji. Clinical experience with collagen injection of the vocal fold: a study of 155 patients.. Auris, nasus, larynx. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2007.07.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.