Cost analysis study comparing the impact of treatment with aprotinin versus tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass.

OBJECTIVES

An increased risk of mortality and postoperative side effects led to aprotinin (Trasylol®) withdrawal from the market in 2008, but since 2018 aprotinin has again been used in France. The French retrospective multicentre APACHE study (AProtinin versus tranexamic Acid in Cardiac surgery patients with High-risk for Excessive bleeding) compared the efficacy of tranexamic acid versus half-dose aprotinin. The aim of this study, ancillary to the APACHE study, is to carry out a medico-economic analysis of the use of these two antifibrinolytics on an APACHE subpopulation.

METHODS

Economic data on reimbursement by the French health insurance system were extracted from the program for the data processing of medical information, and quantitative data on the cost of healthcare products were obtained from the hospital pharmacy software.

RESULTS

The main analysis of costs for the population shows that the global valuation was not significantly different between the two treatment groups (P=0.60), but the costs of blood products included in the related hospital stay group (Groupe Homogène de séjour [GHS]) (whole blood, platelets and plasma) were higher for the tranexamic acid group (P=0.007). In a sub-analysis of patients alive at discharge, the costs of blood products in addition to GHS (blood-derived medicines) and the costs of blood products in the GHS were higher for the tranexamic acid group (P=0.04 and 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The additional cost of aprotinin at the time of purchase is offset by the additional costs of blood products in the tranexamic acid group.