DOI 10.1007/s10661-022-10571-1
Area-to-point regression Kriging approach fusion of Landsat 8 OLI and Sentinel 2 data for assessment of soil macronutrients at Anaimalai, Coimbatore.
Аннотация
Spectral indices-based soil prediction models derived from multispectral datasets are too intricate in terms of accuracy as well as resolution. Complications arise while incorporating multispectral datasets for regional-scale spatial assessment of soil macronutrients. Sporadically satellite image fusion techniques have been used for soil nutrient interpolation to circumvent the complications. The fusion of multispectral bands encompasses precise soil information that cannot be observed as accurate with single satellite dataset. In this study, fusion of near infrared regions of Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager and Sentinel 2 has been observed for its contribution on soil macronutrient assessments. Area-to-point regression Kriging (ATPRK) approach is followed in fusing the two satellite imagery and in situ soil spectral have used for the validation of the resultant. Comparative statistical analysis on Landsat 8 OLI band 5 (wavelength: 845-885 nm), Sentine-2 band 8,8A (wavelength: 785-900 nm) datasets and fused satellite bands provides R2 values of 0.8209, 0.8436, and 0.8763 respectively. Regression models y = (0.25006 ± 0.00754) + (0.0000313)x, y = (0.25252 ± 0.0062) + (0.0000810)x, and y = (0.23715 ± 0.0062) + (0.0001210)x for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium respectively aids for soil macronutrient interpolation and assessments. Computations reveals the ranges of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium that floats from 48 to 295 kg/ha, 5.0 to 37 kg/ha, and 32 to 455 kg/ha in the study area. Fusion of satellite imagery by ATPRK approaches in soil macronutrient study at regional scale brings the novelty of the study.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.