MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000368078

Медицинская библиотека · Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015

Treatment of neurofibromas with a carbon dioxide laser: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 106 patients.

Méni Cécile, Sbidian Emilie, Moreno Jean Christophe, Lafaye Séverine, Buffard Valérie, Goldzal Serge, Wolkenstein Pierre, Valeyrie-Allanore Laurence

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated the efficacy of carbon dioxide (CO2) laser ablation for treating neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate laser treatment safety and patient satisfaction at the French National Referral Centre for Neurofibromatosis.

METHODS

Retrospective survey with a specific questionnaire. The principal outcome measures included pain evaluation and assessments of treatment safety.

RESULTS

We included 106 patients, 70% of whom had more than 50 neurofibromas. Laser treatment was performed mostly for aesthetic reasons, or due to pain, recurrent local trauma or familial influence, under a local anaesthetic, during outpatient visits. The mean pain score was 4.0 ± 2.7 during the administration of local anaesthesia, 2.4 ± 2.1 during laser treatment and <2 48 h after treatment in 56% of cases. The mean satisfaction score for the treatment was 4.6 ± 3.4 and was not associated with disease phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

CO2 laser treatment for NF could be considered more frequently and might help to decrease the social impact of the disease.

Для цитирования: Méni Cécile, Sbidian Emilie, Moreno Jean Christophe, Lafaye Séverine, Buffard Valérie, Goldzal Serge, Wolkenstein Pierre, Valeyrie-Allanore Laurence. Treatment of neurofibromas with a carbon dioxide laser: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 106 patients.. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland). 2015. DOI: 10.1159/000368078.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.