MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10157-010-0332-x

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2010

Renal allograft recipient with co-existing BK virus nephropathy and pulmonary histoplasmosis: report of a case.

Sharma Alok, Gupta Ruchika, Ahuja Arvind, Iyer Venkateswaran K, Bora Mitul, Agarwal Sanjay K, Dinda Amit K

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Renal allograft recipients are prone to opportunistic infections, rarely multiple coexisting infections, due to the immunocompromised state. To the best of our knowledge, no case of a co-existing polyoma virus nephropathy and pulmonary histoplasmosis in a renal allograft recipient has been reported so far in the available literature. A 55-year-old male renal allograft recipient underwent graft biopsy for asymptomatic graft dysfunction. The graft biopsy showed features of polyoma virus nephropathy. Soon after, he developed fever with pulmonary nodules. Fine-needle aspiration from lung nodules showed intracellular yeast forms of histoplasma. The patient responded well to amphotericin B with subsidence of fever. The co-existence of renal allograft-limited infection like polyoma virus and systemic fungal infection such as histoplasmosis should be kept in mind in a transplant recipient with graft dysfunction and non-specific systemic symptoms. Prompt recognition of these infections permits the clinician to institute appropriate therapeutic modification and improved survival.

Для цитирования: Sharma Alok, Gupta Ruchika, Ahuja Arvind, Iyer Venkateswaran K, Bora Mitul, Agarwal Sanjay K, Dinda Amit K. Renal allograft recipient with co-existing BK virus nephropathy and pulmonary histoplasmosis: report of a case.. Clinical and experimental nephrology. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s10157-010-0332-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.