Transplantation · 2008
Comparison of sirolimus alone with sirolimus plus tacrolimus in type 1 diabetic recipients of cultured islet cell grafts.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gillard Pieter, Ling Zhidong, Mathieu Chantal, Crenier Laurent, Lannoo Matthias, Maes Bart, Roep Bart, Gorus Frans, Pipeleers Daniel, Keymeulen Bart
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: One year survival of islet cell grafts has been reproducibly achieved under combination immune therapy including tacrolimus (TAC). However, the use of TAC causes beta-cell and renal toxicity. Because sirolimus (SIR) monotherapy was successful in kidney transplantation under antithymocyte globulin (ATG), we undertook a pilot study comparing SIR monotherapy with SIR-TAC combination therapy.
METHODS: Nonuremic type 1 diabetics received a cultured beta-cell graft under ATG and were randomly assigned to SIR or SIR-TAC-maintenance therapy; a second graft was implanted during posttransplantation month 3 without ATG. The planned number of patients per group (n=10) was reduced to five in view of the observed side effects.
RESULTS: At posttransplant month 6, three SIR-patients had lost graft function and two presented marginal function; among SIR-TAC-patients, there were two early graft failures but three became insulin-independent. These three patients maintained metabolically relevant function (C-peptide >1 ng/ml and coefficient of variation fasting glycemia <25%) for more than 2 years but low-dose insulin therapy was needed from 8, 18, and 26 months posttransplant; this was still the case in two of them after reducing and stopping TAC dose. In both groups, incapacitating adverse events were attributed to sirolimus requiring its discontinuation in 4 of 10 patients; in the 3 patients with pretransplant microalbuminuria, macroalbuminuria developed which resolved when sirolimus was stopped.
CONCLUSIONS: SIR monotherapy is not sufficient to suppress rejection after transplantation under ATG, but it can maintain survival of established beta-cell grafts. However, the risk for a SIR-induced proteinuria remains a concern.
METHODS: Nonuremic type 1 diabetics received a cultured beta-cell graft under ATG and were randomly assigned to SIR or SIR-TAC-maintenance therapy; a second graft was implanted during posttransplantation month 3 without ATG. The planned number of patients per group (n=10) was reduced to five in view of the observed side effects.
RESULTS: At posttransplant month 6, three SIR-patients had lost graft function and two presented marginal function; among SIR-TAC-patients, there were two early graft failures but three became insulin-independent. These three patients maintained metabolically relevant function (C-peptide >1 ng/ml and coefficient of variation fasting glycemia <25%) for more than 2 years but low-dose insulin therapy was needed from 8, 18, and 26 months posttransplant; this was still the case in two of them after reducing and stopping TAC dose. In both groups, incapacitating adverse events were attributed to sirolimus requiring its discontinuation in 4 of 10 patients; in the 3 patients with pretransplant microalbuminuria, macroalbuminuria developed which resolved when sirolimus was stopped.
CONCLUSIONS: SIR monotherapy is not sufficient to suppress rejection after transplantation under ATG, but it can maintain survival of established beta-cell grafts. However, the risk for a SIR-induced proteinuria remains a concern.